Uri Avnery On Chickenshit

220px-UriAvneryUri Avnery

November 1, 2014


WHEN A high-ranking official of one country calls the leader of another country “chickenshit”, it may be assumed that the relations between the two countries are not at their best. In fact, they may be considered somewhat less than cordial.

This week, It happened. An unnamed very high-ranking US official said this in an interview with the respected American journalist who bears the very Jewish name of Jeffrey Goldberg.

No high-ranking official would use such a term for publication without the express permission of the President of the United States of America. So here we are.

HISTORY HAS seen many strange relationships between nations. But I dare say none stranger than that existing between Israel and the US.

On the face of it, no two states could be closer to each other. Just a minor example: the day the memorable Chickenshit remark made headlines, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted a resolution calling upon the US to put an end to its 50-year old embargo on Cuba. 188 countries, including the whole spectrum of EU and NATO countries, voted in favor. Two states voted against: the US and Israel.

Two countries against the entire world? No, not entirely. Micronesia, Palau and the Marshal Islands abstained. (These three mighty island nations generally support Israel, too, though few Israelis could place them on the map.)

Throughout the years, in hundreds of UN votes, Israel has stood loyally with the US, and vice versa. An unshakable alliance, so it seemed. And now they call our valiant Prime Minister chickenshit?

THE OFFICIAL based his uncomplimentary remark on Binyamin Netanyahu’s disinclination to bomb Iran, as threatened repeatedly, as well as on Netanyahu’s unwillingness to make peace with the Palestinians.

The first accusation is unfounded, since Netanyahu never seriously considered an attack on Iran. Some of my readers may remember that from the first day I assured them that such an attack would not happen, without even leaving myself a loophole in case I might be wrong. I knew that such an attack was quite out of the question. And not only because the entire Israeli defense establishment was against it. 

The second accusation is even more groundless. Netanyahu did not chicken out of making peace. This would presuppose that he wanted peace in the first place. If the Americans really believe so, they should read a few good articles (especially mine).

Netanyahu never entertained even for a moment the idea of making peace. His entire upbringing makes this quite impossible. His late father, Ben-Zion, was such an extreme and rigid nationalist, that compared to him Vladimir Jabotinsky, the Zionist right-wing leader, looked like a leftist pacifist.

Every word Binyamin Netanyahu has ever uttered in favor of peace and the Two-State solution was a blatant lie. For him to advocate a Palestinian state is like the Chief Rabbi advocating eating pork on Yom Kippur.

Any American diplomat who does not know this should be transferred at once to Micronesia (or Palau).

LATELY IT seems that Netanyahu has been doing everything in his power to provoke a quarrel with the US government.

At first sight, this looks like an act of lunacy, an act so dangerous that any competent psychiatrist would commit him to the closed wing of an asylum.

Israel is totally dependent on the US – not 99%, but 100%. On the very same day as the publication of the Chickenshit statement, the US agreed to sell Israel a second squadron of F-35 fighter planes, after the sale of the first 19 planes (which costs 2.35 billion dollars). The money comes from the yearly tribute the US pays to Israel.

Without the automatic US veto on all UN Security Council resolutions not approved by the Israeli government, there would have long been a State of Palestine as a full-fledged member of the UN. A cornerstone of our foreign relations is the belief of many countries that in order to gain entrance to the favors of the US Congress, they first need to bribe the gatekeeper – Israel. And so on.

Literally every Israeli is convinced that our relationship with the US is the lifeline of the state. If there is anything at all on which Israelis of all age groups, communities, beliefs and political orientations are unanimous, it is this conviction.

So how come our prime minister is working full-time on destroying the relationship between the two governments?

When our Minister of Defense, Moshe Ya’alon, visited Washington DC this week, all his requests to meet US cabinet ministers and other high officials were categorically refused, except for a meeting with his colleague, Chuck Hagel, who could not very well object. It was an unprecedented, open insult.

Ya’alon, a former Chief of Staff of the army, is not considered a genius. Some believe that it would have been better if he had stayed at his former profession – milking cows in a kibbutz. When he declared that John Kerry suffered from an “Obsessive Messianism” in his efforts to achieve peace between Israel and Palestine, both Kerry and President Barack Obama were deeply offended.

But such statements by Israeli cabinet ministers have become routine.  So have the sharp rebuttals of official US spokesmen and spokeswomen. These are ignored by the Israeli public.

BINYAMIN NETANYAHU is no fool. Chickenshit or not, unlike Ya’alon he is considered smart and intelligent. So what is he doing?

There is  method in his madness.

Netanyahu grew up in the United States. When his father was boycotted by Israeli academia, which refused to take him seriously as a historian, the family moved to a suburb of Philadelphia. Binyamin prides himself on having an intimate knowledge of the US.

What is he thinking about?

He knows that Israel controls the US Congress. No American politician could possible be reelected if he voiced even the slightest hint of criticism of the “Jewish State”. AIPAC, the most powerful lobby in Washington (apart from the National Rifle Association) will see to that. The powerful grip the Jewish lobby has on the media is a further guarantee.

In Netanyahu’s view, in any confrontation between Congress and the White House over Israel, the President is bound to lose. So there is nothing to be afraid of.

NETANYAHU, IN FACT is playing roulette with all the capital of Israel in the vast casino called the USA. Perhaps he has been infected by his mentor and protector, the Casino Czar Sheldon Adelson, who has a hand in conducting Israeli policy in the US.

(It was Adelson who appointed the Israeli ambassador in Washington, Ron Dremer, a prominent activist of the Republican party, who is detested by the White House.)

In order to appreciate the magnitude of Netanyahu’s gamble, with us as chips, one has to visualize the state of the union.

The US is now a dysfunctional democracy.

In a normal democracy – say the UK or Germany – there are two central parties, or party coalitions, which face each other. They are both “mainstream” and the differences between them are minor. They succeed each other from time to time without much ado. The citizens hardly notice.

Not in the US. Not anymore.

The American public is now deeply divided between two camps, which hate each other from the bottom of their hearts (if they have any). This hatred is abysmal. One is the party of the ultra-rich, who defend their privileges, the other belongs to the moderately wealthy and serves their interests.

The ideologies  of the two camps are diametrically opposed. Therefore, they cannot agree practically on anything. Anything the Democrats do is considered almost treason by the Republicans, anything the Republicans advocate is considered by the Democrats as stupid, if not crazy

The Republicans, who control Congress (and may do so even more firmly in a few days time) are out to immobilize the administration. Once they even stopped all federal payments, making the running of the state impossible. A consistent joint foreign policy is out of the question. I am not sure that the situation on the eve of the great Civil War was much worse.

INTO THIS crazy situation Netanyahu has plunged. He has placed all his chips (us) on the Republicans.

During the last presidential elections, he almost openly supported Mitt Romney, the opponent of Obama, thus practically declaring war on the present administration. The radical anti-Obama statements made now by Israeli leaders are used – and designed to be used – by Republican candidates against their Democratic opponents. 

The Democrats make strenuous efforts to woo Jewish voters and donors by flattering Israel in the most outrageous terms, promising to support each and every action of the Israeli government, now and for all eternity, be it what it may. Inadvertently, they stick knives into the back of the Israeli peace forces, making the fight for peace even more Herculean.

But even if the mid-term elections make the House and the Senate even more subservient to the Israeli right-wing, Obama will be around for two more years. In a way, having no more elections to fear, he will be freer than before to obstruct Netanyahu.

I wish he would. But I do not entertain too much hope. Even as a lame duck, he will still have to consider the interests of the next Democratic candidate for the White House.

OBAMA COULD still do a lot for peace between Israel and Palestine, a peace supported by the entire pro-American Arab bloc – something clearly in the US national interest, not to mention ours.

For that, courage is needed. And – yes – a little more Obsessive Messianism.

(Visited 65 times, 1 visits today)

You may also like...

1 Response

  1. Poo says:

    Full disclosure, we have failed politicians like Avnery as columnists and talking heads here too, mostly in the Toronto Star or on the CBC though others do appear with some regularity elsewhere as well. That is work they have to seek out as opposed to the Star and CBC who offer a welcome mat and a T-shirt as long as the viewpoints expressed are to the radical left. Them they give prime space and time. Go figure. Odd, Avnery has found such limited exposure here. Maybe I missed him. Pity.

    I was raised to attack ideas. A cheap shot at an opponent’s dead Father is what we here call real “chickenshit.” Try that on a hockey rink anywhere in this country if you need proof.

    “High ranking” officials never name-call although anything is believable from the Community Centre formerly known as the White House. “It may be assumed that the relations between the two countries are not at their best.” Well. I was also taught to never assume. “Somewhat less than cordial” would describe Obama’s relations with pretty much everyone these days, even his friends who are running away from him as they seek re-election. As for foreign countries, Obama is simply not trusted; not here, not in Europe and most certainly not in the Middle East. Obama is not a lame duck; he’s just lame! His Socialite of State is no help either. They are both down to borrowing money to give away in order to maintain “relations.” Friendships are a thing of the past and will await the arrival of a new President, Democrat or Republican but I fail to see how any Republican can overcome the demographic odds and a spending Democrat.

    “No high-ranking official (read nameless wanker) would use such a term for publication without the express permission of the President of the United States of America.” Now again, that is what we here up in the frozen north would also call “chickenshit.” To send someone out to fight your battles used to be the ultimate in “chickenshit.” Only Obama could surpass that by sending someone out to say naughty words for him. How absurd, but that is what Avnery surmises. He just doesn’t know, does he? I’ve become quite used to reading about what Avnery doesn’t know. And besides, “they” didn’t call the Prime Minister a name, some nameless nobody did, maybe. It’s a good story and the NY Times never lies, does it?

    Like it or lump it, America supports Israel and no social worker from Chicago can change that. Obama has bigger problems than Israel or Netanyahu, in any case. In turns, Obama has lately been “upset, “frustrated,” “angry“ and “mad as hell.” He “won’t stand for it,” or so he says but in fact, he has for 5 1/2 years. His bureaucracies are incompetent, inefficient and often corrupt. With the Mid East in flames, the Health Care fiasco, Benghazi, the Secret Service scandal, the Fast and Furious fiasco, the lack of Justice Department, the summer border crisis, Ferguson, the rise of the Islamic State, Ebola, so many more and who knows what next; the president of the National Democratic Community Centre is stuck. He can’t blame it all on Bush. He’s been gone a long time. Even the Sunni/Shiite wars trace their origins to the death of Muhammad in 632. Like that’s Bush’s fault? And it was Obama who bragged about leaving Iraq. ‘They wouldn’t let me stay’, remember? What else can he do but stamp his feet and act petulant? The American public expects competence at the very least but those he appointed to run the IRS, Veteran’s Affairs, Energy and the Environment and well, everything else aren’t up to the task. Obama says it’s them, not me. His leading from behind is actually doing nothing while the world and the voters pass him by. Obama loves the pomp and ceremony of the job but who couldn’t swan about and make speeches. It’s the managerial aspects of the presidency (the buck stops, etc.) that lie outside his level of competence. He is no administrator and his administration shows it. It’s leaderless and out of control. And Kerry? Jet Ski anyone?

    As for Netanyahu, even Avnery admits, though not by compliment, that Netanyahu is far from a “chickenshit.” Perhaps the wanker quoted was referring to his own boss and the writer misunderstood or wrote the better story. Hey, I can speculate. Why not? Avnery does.

    Avnery’s analysis of the U.S. political parties and their system of government is as infantile and myopic as usual viewed and skewed as it is through his egomaniacal eye on the face in his mirror. His analysis of what constitutes “a normal democracy” is also skewed. Parliamentary systems as seen in the UK or Germany as cited, offer many more parties and philosophies which Avnery would learn by a quick Google search. But when you know it all why learn? There are large differences between these parties and their citizens notice the difference. The Government in a parliamentary system is faced by an opposition which opposes. Here in Canada the government is faced by 4 parties who vigorously oppose and all offer different philosophies. Two are of the size to gain power as one has many times in the past. The government is conservative. The loyal opposition is socialist, or so their manifesto claims. You think Canadians wouldn’t notice the difference? Avnery may think the rest of us are all stupid and have no idea what our votes may or may not mean but he is wrong. What else is new? ‘Mirror mirror, on the wall’ is not a recognized philosophy or a viable form of research. Someone should tell him.

    If Israel and Palestine shared a community centre Obama could do a lot for peace between them, even with his Socialite of State hob-nobbing about with cocktails and canapés. It would, however, take a great deal of other people’s money. That’s how community centres are run. Just ask Obama. It is not about diplomacy and tact; it is all about a big cheque in the end. “Obsessive Messianism” won’t write that. Avnery knows this too. He just won’t admit it. He can’t. It’s a fact.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *