{"id":4667,"date":"2010-09-02T07:25:04","date_gmt":"2010-09-02T11:25:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/?p=4667"},"modified":"2010-09-02T07:25:04","modified_gmt":"2010-09-02T11:25:04","slug":"stephen-kessler-on-george-hitchcock","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/stephen-kessler-on-george-hitchcock\/","title":{"rendered":"Stephen Kessler on George Hitchcock"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"articleContent\">\n<div id=\"articleThumb\">\n<div>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Here is Stephen Kessler&#8217;s obit for George Hitchcock, as published yesterday in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.santacruz.com\/Main_Page\">SantaCruz.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\">George Hitchcock, 1914-2010<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img decoding=\"async\" data-src=\"http:\/\/news.santacruz.com\/assets\/news\/images\/jorgehitchcock.jpg\" alt=\"\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" class=\"lazyload\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">When I was an undergraduate and aspiring poet at school in  upstate New York in the mid-1960s I started reading the  small-circulation independent literary journals known as little  magazines. It was a volatile historical moment when cultural life was  starting to erupt in all sorts of unpredictable forms, and one of those  forms was this suddenly dynamic proliferation of creative periodicals  run by eccentric individuals with a taste for poetry and some esthetic  agenda or political viewpoint to promulgate, and read by a self-selected  bohemian elite. One such journal was the San Francisco quarterly <em>kayak<\/em>,  a remarkably lively magazine launched in 1964 and publishing some of  the best poets, both famed and unknown, then writing in the United  States. The editor and publisher of <em>kayak<\/em> was someone named George Hitchcock.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Like pretty much every other anti-Establishment poet in the country, I wanted to be in <em>kayak<\/em>,  so I started submitting my poems\u2014and promptly receiving them back along  with shockingly irreverent rejection slips with deadpan regrets from  the editor accompanied by a comical collage or illustration clipped from  some 19th-century picture book featuring a man falling into a hole or  being devoured by wolves or shot by a firing squad or suffering some  other unfortunate fate. These rejections, in addition to being amazingly  quick and thus sparing you the agony of suspense, had a lighthearted  \u201ctough luck\u201d in the subtext\u2014none of those  \u201cwe-found-much-to-admire-in-your-work-but-due-to-the-large-volume-of-submissions  . . . and-good-luck-placing-it-elsewhere\u201d notes more typical of today\u2019s  creative-writing-program-based reviews. No niceness or phony  encouragement tainted <em>kayak<\/em>\u2019s forthright rejections with insincerity.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">When I returned to California for graduate school at UC-Santa Cruz in  1968 I met George Hitchcock at a small gathering at the home of poet  Morton Marcus, who had also moved there that year to teach at Cabrillo  College. As destiny would have it, Hitchcock moved to Santa Cruz the  following year to teach writing and theater at UCSC\u2019s new College V,  whose academic theme was to be the arts.\u00a0 While continuing to collect  rejections from <em>kayak<\/em> I gradually, in the course of occasional  encounters, began to get to know its humorously grumpy editor. Near the  end of my career in grad school, before flipping out and dropping out, I  took George\u2019s poetry workshop, and when the term was over he invited me  to serve as his teaching assistant next quarter in improvisational  acting. This seemed to me very strange, as I had zero experience in  theater, but evidently the teacher detected something in my poems or  personality that he thought would enable me to improvise the role of his  TA.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Instead I continued my graduate studies in various madhouses up and  down the state, returning to Santa Cruz the following year unsure  whether to resume pursuit of the PhD or take a leap into the unknown and  try to be a writer. One night George\u2019s friend Kenneth Rexroth was  giving a reading on campus and I happened to run into George on the way  to the hall. I told him I was thinking about going back to graduate  school but wasn\u2019t sure if I should. He asked, \u201cDo you need the money?\u201d I  had a fellowship but also some family income, enough to live on. \u201cNo,\u201d I  answered.\u00a0 He said, \u201cDon\u2019t do it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was the best advice I ever received.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In those days before the MFA industry and Garrison Keillor made  poetry a respectable occupation, to decide you wanted to be a poet was  not a plausible career move. You were dooming yourself to a life at the  edge of eerything, with neither a guaranteed income nor any sign of  societal acceptance.\u00a0 Hitchcock, with his own anti-academic history and a  brief career in progress as an accidental professor, apparently had  concluded that, at least for someone like me, unemployability was a  better bet than professorhood.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Eventually my poems made it into the pages of <em>kayak<\/em>, and in 1975 George published my first book. The <em>kayak<\/em> imprint was a great endorsement, and though the book received mixed  reviews, it did get reviewed, and at the premature age of 28 I was  launched as an author. Hitchcock, in his gruff and subtle way, had given  my so-called career a supportive shove. I wasn\u2019t the only poet, young  or mature, for whom George had played such a role. Over the next several  years I would meet many of them in the community that grew out of <em>kayak<\/em>, both in its pages and in the legendary collating parties where the magazine was physically put together.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Three or four times a year, on a Sunday afternoon, dozens of poets and friends of <em>kayak<\/em> would gather at George\u2019s house in Santa Cruz to collate, staple, stuff,  stamp and send out the latest issue.\u00a0 George\u2014a skilled printer, among  his other crafts and arts\u2014by then had printed the pages himself on a  press in the shop on his property, and the issue would be assembled by  his crew of helpers, whom he and his partner, Marjorie Simon, would  supply with platters of cold cuts and plenty of beverages. It made for  delightful social life\u2014many good friendships and collegial acquaintances  were initiated\u2014and efficiently accomplished the mission of putting out  the magazine. George was the director of this operation, positioning  people on the assembly line and instructing them on procedures (if this  was their first time) but otherwise assuming as low a profile as his  leonine 6-foot-4 physique would allow. He ran things in a way that  enabled his helpers to run themselves.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">His poetry workshops worked much the same way. George rarely  commented on students\u2019 writing, rather allowing participants to read and  remark on one another\u2019s efforts. He didn\u2019t assert authority or try to  push the poets in one direction or another, instead just listening  attentively, sometimes making a brief comment, or starting an exercise  with some object he would pass around the room\u2014in his apartment at  College V in the workshop I took with him in 1969, later in his living  room in Bonny Doon or in the big Victorian on Ocean View in Santa  Cruz\u2014and turning the writers loose to riff associatively, giving free  rein to their imaginations.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was imagination that he valued above all\u2014not autobiography or  sentiment or noble thoughts or \u201cspirituality\u201d\u2014but a sense of invention,  discovery, astonishment and wit. In criticism, intellectual honesty was  paramount. <em>kayak<\/em> ran from 1964 to 1984, a total of 64 issues, and  that was that. George, as self-described \u201cdictator\u201d of the enterprise,  was ready to move on to other things\u2014more of his own writing, visual  art, teaching, acting, directing, traveling.\u00a0 He\u2019d been a merchant  seaman, a labor organizer, a gardener, an actor, a novelist, an investor  (municipal bonds, he once counseled me, were the best place to put your  money), a poet, someone you couldn\u2019t easily pin down with a limiting  definition. After the earthquake of 1989 he and Marjorie left Santa Cruz  and returned to his native Oregon, where he continued with his various  activities, spending winters in La Paz, at the tip of Baja, where  George, as \u201cJorge Hitchcock,\u201d frequently showed his whimsical,  surrealish, sophisticated, mordant, quasi-primitive paintings and  collages in local galleries.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">George Hitchcock died at his home in Eugene on the night of Aug. 27.\u00a0  He was 96 years old and had lived an extraordinarily creative and fully  realized life.\u00a0 He was an influential teacher, more by example than  direct instruction, to many other writers and editors, including this  one, and a legendary figure in the literary culture of the \u201860s through  the \u201980s\u2014a model of independence, ethics and integrity\u2014without ever  making a spectacle of himself or trying to play the role of anyone\u2019s  guru.\u00a0 He didn\u2019t like to be the center of attention but enjoyed  providing a setting for others to interact and flourish. <em>kayak<\/em> was both a highly individual vehicle, a \u201cone-man boat\u201d piloted by the  editor\u2019s singular vision, and a community effort created at his famous  Sunday get-togethers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">At a time when the academic formalist model was fading as a viable  style for contemporary poetry, and the New York School and Black  Mountain poets and the Beat movement were on the rise, George took <em>kayak<\/em> in its own unique direction, cultivating an imagistic, surrealist,  non-doctrinaire, irreverent, often political, sometimes polemical  sensibility, and publishing a range of poets from W. S. Merwin and  Raymond Carver and Michael McClure to Robert Bly and Gary Snyder and  Philip Levine, as well as many lesser-known bards like me. The magazine  also printed letters and George\u2019s collage illustrations\u2014always  provocative and amusing\u2014and had a section for criticism where I  published my first book reviews. It was easily one of the most vital  publications of that or any era in American poetry.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">But his post-<em>kayak<\/em> years were at least as fertile, with a  prolific output of art and a continuing creative evolution as an  all-around man of culture who proceeded on his own path while also  encouraging others\u2014for example, endowing a poetry fund at UCSC for  nurturing the art and its writers through readings and other programs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">His personal style, in the years I knew him, tended to tweed jackets,  sometimes a cape, paisley ascots, rakish hats (often with a feather in  the hatband), a pipe, a walking stick\u2014a somewhat Oscar Wildean figure of  anachronistic fashion\u2014and  a resonant tenor voice that bespoke his  stage experience. He liked to dress up in a scary costume on Halloween  and give the trick-or-treaters the fright of their night. The Day of the  Dead, with its dancing skeletons and festive celebrations of the  departed, was a holiday suited to his darkly comic temperament.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">He hitched his <em>kayak<\/em> to a star and blazed a long bright streak across the sky.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is Stephen Kessler&#8217;s obit for George Hitchcock, as published yesterday in SantaCruz.com. George Hitchcock, 1914-2010 When I was an undergraduate and aspiring poet at school in upstate New York in the mid-1960s I&#46;&#46;&#46;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[76,91,94],"tags":[810,682],"class_list":["post-4667","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-obituaries","category-poetry","category-poets","tag-george-hitchcock","tag-stephen-kessler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4667","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4667"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4667\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4671,"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4667\/revisions\/4671"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4667"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4667"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}