![\"\"](\"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/02\/BernsteinBenjamin-262x350.jpg\" "\\"Bernstein&Benjamin\\"")
Charles Bernstein lending a hat to Walter Benjamin<\/p><\/div>\n
Much enjoyed the Chicago interview Charles Bernstein<\/strong> gave to Daniel Benjamin for the Chicago Weekly<\/strong><\/em> while in that town a week. or two ago. Below, a short extract. Go here<\/a> to read the whole shmear\/schmier (which may be a Yiddish word in New York, but where I come from it is Letzebuergesch and refers to a really mighty slice of bread with butter and whatever else you like on it. most satisfying, morning, noon or night)<\/a>.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E assembled a compendium of samples, a range of activities that had no natural place of their own, no proper place. Here I would use the term of Michel de Certeau and say we were about tactics<\/em> because we were not able to have a strategy<\/em>.\u00a0 Certeau speaks about strategy as being for someone that has the high ground, the proper space; tactics are activities that undermine those controlling interests.\u00a0 Although I\u2019d also say that it\u2019s not just tactical, that what\u2019s needed is a poetics of tactics, so there is of a larger reflection on the nature of how those tactics operate. In that sense, L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E was a constellation of tactics without an underlying principle, except perhaps Joe Hill\u2019s: don\u2019t mourn, organize. The absence of an underlying principle is, I think, what I mean by \u201cimaginary\u201d in my initial reply to you; I think it\u2019s crucial to why the magazine may have resonance now (if it does). Often poetry groupings have more to do with commitments to a specific style or to a particular social milieu. \u201cNot that there\u2019s anything wrong with that!\u201d, as Seinfeld would say. But either I wasn\u2019t interested in that or maybe it\u2019s just that in New York in the mid-\u201970s I was too much on the periphery of the art and poetry and performance subcultures that I found most attractive, and I didn\u2019t find any one style that I wanted to marry either. So we made something up!\u00a0 But eclecticism was not our thing either.<\/p>\n L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E was a montage. We were about constellation not juxtaposition. It was all about picking and choosing to create a palpable, compelling even tantalizing sense of the possibilities for poetry, all the time acknowledging the history we felt ourselves extending. And forging friendships and commitments as we went along.<\/p>\n I understand this kind of approach isn\u2019t for all poets, or maybe even for most poets, many of whom would find so much organizing a distraction. But for me\u2014and this takes me through the rest of my life\u2014organizing<\/em> is a poetic practice. I think of poetry, marginal though it is, as a fundamental activity within our culture. I think of it as historical, cognitive, philosophical, aesthetic work. Because I think that, I try to put things together that might not go together at first\u2014but then, after not too long, it might seem they were\u2014almost\u2014a natural fit.\u00a0 And for me it also means mapping poetic work onto multiple cultural spaces, some expected some not\u2014the internet, universities, reading series, the visual arts, music, film, little magazines, performance, publishing, radio.<\/p>\n With L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E, there were a number of poets who were in conversation, engaged in a discussion of the linguistic turn, of the significance of verbal language as a perceptual membrane that changes the way we see the world, of the possibilities of continuing formal invention within poetry and the social implications of such invention, and of the relation of voices to voicing, found materials to made patterns, parts to wholes, standardization to conformity \u2026<\/p>\n L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E\u00a0 is syncretic. Our conversations melded into an alloy. And there is one more crucial element, maybe most important of all: our commitment to non-expository modes of discursive thinking; to new essays forms engaged with nonlinear thinking. Essays, poetics as a crucial part of the work of poetry \u2026<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Much enjoyed the Chicago interview Charles Bernstein gave to Daniel Benjamin for the Chicago Weekly while in that town a week. or two ago. Below, a short extract. Go here to read the whole...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3211","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3211","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3211"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3211\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3211"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3211"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3211"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n