{"id":16462,"date":"2019-03-03T18:42:13","date_gmt":"2019-03-03T23:42:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/?p=16462"},"modified":"2019-03-03T18:42:14","modified_gmt":"2019-03-03T23:42:14","slug":"dante-sollers-paradise-a-neologism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/dante-sollers-paradise-a-neologism\/","title":{"rendered":"Dante, Sollers, Paradise & A Neologism"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Sunday afternoon reading in Philippe Sollers & Josyane Savigneau\u2019s Une conversation infinie<\/em> which Nicole brought back for me from Paris. Page 18, Sollers speaks of Dante: \u201cIn the Divine Comedy, Dante often invents new words; he is in the process of inventing Italian, to which one has to go back in his version of things. A very great love story, The Divine Comedy<\/em>.Among other things he invents a word that seems essential to me. We are going toward Paradise and he invents the word \u201ctoujourises \/ to foreverise.\u201d It\u2019s in Canto X of the paradise: \u201d se non cold dove\u2019l gooier s\u2019insempra,\u201d qui l\u00e0 o\u00f9 jouir se toujourise \/ that where to \u2018jouir\u2019 foreverises itself.\u201d Insemprar. One off the neologisms dante loved to create. Astounding invention. If I love someone it is with the desire toward duration, thus too foreverize the relation with that person. That foreverization \u2014 I pick up on Dante\u2019s word which I find to be very precise, just like to transhumanize, to pass through the human to go toward something else, the paradisiacal. \u00a0Why not go to paradise? There certainly may be people who prefer hell, because one makes more stimulating encounters there, as Jacques Sttali once said on TV. It\u2019s mind boggling, but if that pleases him, why not. I prefer paradise.\u201d<\/p>\n

Checking in my English translations of the Paradiso,<\/em>\u00a0I see that most of them don\u2019t translate the neologistic word formation directly, but circumvent it with versions that go from \u201cwhere joy taketh itself eternal, \u201d (Temple Classics Edition, translator not identified or only with initials: either P.H.W. or H.O. or both) to Stanley Lombardo\u2019s \u201cwhen there is joy eternally.\u201d The only version I found that does translate the dantean word formation is Robert Durling\u2019s which gives the verse as \u201crejoicing forevers itself.\u201d Which is excellent indeed. Now salacious Sollers (sorry, couldn\u2019t help the punning alliteration\u2026) translates \u201cgioir\u201d as \u201cjouir\u201d which beats basic \u201cjoy,\u201d or extends it into domains unchaste for most Dante admirers, especially now that we are out of the Inferno & en route in\/toward the Paradiso \u2014 the basic dictionary def. gives the word\u2019s meaning as \u201cto have an orgasm.\u201d Those well-read in late 20C french theory will have come across the problems of translating & defining \u201cjouir.\u201d Be that as it may.<\/p>\n

My pleasure today was Dante\u2019s \u201cinsemprar,\u201d to foreverize. Sollers goes on to suggest that if \u201camour toujours\u201d is a clich\u00e9 bound to disappear eventually, that one would want it, love, to last forever, though usually it don\u2019t last that long\u2026 So what to do? Sollers: \u201cWell, it can be considered and is feasible. To do so one has to grasp time in a different way. And define that foreverizing as happening at each moment.\u201d There you have it\u2026<\/p>\n

Going to my Dante shelf, I realized that I had more editions of Purgatory<\/em> than of either the Inferno<\/em> or the Paradiso<\/em>. Which reminded me that the middle kingdom (or is one of the problem why purgatory is so looked down upon the fact that it may be a more egalitarian republic rather than a transcendental kingdom?) as a nomadic space has always interested me more than the deadness below or above. And so this wrote itself into the notebook:<\/p>\n

Purgatory is forever, because
\nthe barzakh is all
\nthere is \u2014<\/p>\n

Paradise & hell
\nonly momentary
\nconduits linking an
\ninfinite chain of
\npurgatories.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sunday afternoon reading in Philippe Sollers & Josyane Savigneau\u2019s Une conversation infinie which Nicole brought back for me from Paris. Page 18, Sollers speaks of Dante: \u201cIn the Divine Comedy, Dante often invents new...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1956,103],"tags":[1515,2031],"class_list":["post-16462","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-essay","category-translation","tag-dante","tag-sollers"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16462","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16462"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16462\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16469,"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16462\/revisions\/16469"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16462"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16462"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16462"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}