![\"w430.68de7\"](\"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/w430.68de7.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
The below is a summary of an article I came across via friends &\u00a0Siji Jabbar<\/a>.\u00a0\u00a0<\/b>It is in the February issue of the\u00a0New African<\/a>\u00a0(and draws on an interview given by\u00a0Professor Mamadou Koulibaly<\/a>, Speaker of the Ivorian National Assembly, Professor of Economics, and author of the book The Servitude of the Colonial Pact<\/em>). Here is how Jabbar frames the argument: “Just before France conceded to African demands for independence in the 1960s, it carefully organized its\u00a0former colonies<\/a>\u00a0(CFA countries) in a system of “compulsory solidarity” which consisted of obliging the 14 African states to put 65% of their foreign currency reserves into the French Treasury, plus another 20% for financial liabilities. This means these 14 African countries only ever have access to 15% of their own money! If they need more they have to borrow their own money from the French at commercial rates! And this has been the case since the 1960s.”\u00a0We hope they won’t mind me too sharing it with you influx, so here goes:<\/p>\n THE COLONIAL PACT<\/b><\/p>\n It is the Colonial Pact that set up the common currency for the Francophone countries, the CFA Franc, which demands that each of the 14 C.F.A member countries must deposit 65% (plus another 20% for financial liabilities, making the dizzying total of 85%) of their foreign exchange reserves in an \u201cOperations Account\u201d at the French Treasury in Paris.<\/p>\n The African nations therefore have only access to 15% of their own money for national development in any given year. If they are in need of extra money, as they always are, they have to borrow from their own 65% in the French Treasury at commercial rates. And that is not all: there is a cap on the credit extended to each member country equivalent to 20% of their public revenue in the preceding year. So if the countries need to borrow more than 20%, too bad; they cannot do it. Amazingly, the final say on the C.F.A arrangements belongs to the French Treasury, which invests the African countries\u2019 money in its own name on the Paris Bourse (the stock exchange).<\/p>\n It is also the Colonial Pact that demands that France has the first right to buy or reject any natural resources found in the land of the Francophone countries. So even if the African countries could get better prices elsewhere, they cannot sell to anybody until France says it does not want to buy those natural resources.<\/p>\n It is, again, the Colonial Pact that demands that in the award of government contracts in the African countries, French companies should be considered first; only after that can Africans look elsewhere. It doesn\u2019t matter if Africans can obtain better value for money elsewhere, French companies come first, and most often get the contracts. Currently, there is the awkward case in Abidjan where, before the elections, former president Gbagbo\u2019s government wanted to build a third major bridge to link the central business district (called Plateau) to the rest of the city, from which it is separated by a lagoon. By Colonial Pact tradition, the contract must go to a French company, which incidentally has quoted an astronomical price \u2013 to be paid in euros or US dollars.<\/p>\n Not happy, Gbagbo\u2019s government sought a second quote from the Chinese, who offered to build the bridge at half the price quoted by the French company, and \u2013 wait for this \u2013 payment would be in cocoa beans, of which Cote d\u2019Ivoire is the world\u2019s largest producer. But, unsurprisingly, the French said \u201cnon, you can\u2019t do that\u201d.<\/p>\n Overall the Colonial Pact gives the French a dominant and privileged position over Francophone Africa, but in C\u00f4te d’Ivoire, the jewel of the former French possessions in Africa, the French are overly dominant. Outside parliament, almost all the major utilities – water, electricity, telephone, transport, ports and major banks – are run by French companies or French interests. The same story is found in commerce, construction, and agriculture.<\/p>\n \u00a0In short, the Colonial Pact has created a legal mechanism under which\u00a0France obtains a special place in the political and economic life of its former colonies.<\/p>\n In what meaningful way can any of the 14 CFA countries be said to be independent?<\/p>\n If this isn’t illegal and an international crime, then what\u00a0is<\/i>?<\/p>\n What is it going to take for this state of indentured servitude to end?<\/p>\n How much have the CFA countries lost as a result of this 50-year (and counting) “agreement”? (Remember, they’ve had to borrow their own money from the French at commercial rates)<\/p>\n Do French people know they’re living off the wealth of African countries and have been doing so for over half a century? And if they know, do they give a damn?<\/p>\n When will France start paying back money they’ve sucked from these countries, not only directly from the interest on cash reserves and loans these countries have had to take out, but also on lost earnings from the natural resources the countries sold to France below market rates as well as the lost earnings resulting from awarding contracts to French companies when other contractors could have done things for less?<\/p>\n Does any such “agreement” exist between Britain and\u00a0its<\/i>\u00a0former colonies, or did\u00a0they<\/i>\u00a0really let go when they let go?<\/p>\n PLEASE READ<\/b><\/p>\n The economic and political effects of the CFA zone<\/a><\/p>\n The Servitude of the Colonial Pact<\/a>\u00a0(Interview with Professor Mamadou Koulibaly)\u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n The CFA franc still controlled by Paris<\/a><\/p>\n\n
![\"w430-1.68de7\"](\"https:\/\/pierrejoris.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/w430-1.68de7.jpg\")
<\/a>\u00a0THE BIG QUESTIONS<\/b><\/p>\n